The canning process has a degrading effect on DNA, making the species verification of canned tuna more challenging than for raw fish.
In this paper (open access) the authors optimised and compared three PCR approaches: real-time PCR (RT-PCR), mitochondrial control region (CR) mini-barcode, and multiplex PCR. They tested 24 samples labelled as either albacore, yellowfin, skipjack or light tuna.
They reported RT-PCR as having the highest identification rate (100%), followed by CR mini-barcoding (33%) and multiplex PCR (29%). They consider that the success of RT-PCR may have been due to the short (<100 bp) DNA fragments targeted. In comparison, multiplex PCR and CR mini-barcoding targeted slightly longer fragments of 127–270 and∼236 base pairs, respectively. Regarding species identification, CR mini-barcoding and multiplex PCR confirmed the presence of albacoreor yellowfin tuna in several samples; however, both methods struggled with the identification of skipjack tuna.
CR mini-barcoding enabled sequencing-based detection of a range of species in the products. The authors conclude that a combination of real-time PCR and CR mini-barcoding is the optimum approach for rapid screening of target species along with sequencing-based confirmation.
Photo by Grooveland Designs on Unsplash