volatile (2)

13564306487?profile=RESIZE_400xIn this study (open access) a non-targeted method of headspace-solid phase microextraction with gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC–MS) was developed to achieve the characterization, classification, and authentication of different coffee samples according to geographical production region, and variety (arabica/robusta). Moreover, decaffeinated and non-decaffeinated instant coffee samples were analyzed. Some samples of chicory, a potential coffee adulterant, were also been included. The GC–MS fingerprints were used to classify and characterise the analyzed coffees using principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and partial least squares (PLS) regression.

185 reference samples were used.  42 were chicory (a typical coffee substitute or adulterant), 96 were coffee from three geographical production regions (Vietnam, Cambodia, and Costa Rica) and species (Arabica, Robusta, and Arabica-Robusta mixture), and 47 samples were soluble coffee (decaffeinated and non-decaffeinated). The chicory samples were purchased from Barcelona supermarkets and the coffee samples were from Vietnam, Cambodia and Costa Rica local supermarkets. Each paired PLS-DA model was built using 70 % of samples randomly selected from each group as the calibration set while the remaining 30 % of the samples were employed as the prediction set.  The authors compared models generated using two different GC columns and operating conditions.

The authors tested their model on mixtures prepared in-house from the same reference set:: Vietnamese Arabica Coffee adulterated with Vietnamese Robusta Coffee and Vietnamese Robusta Coffee adulterated with chicory.  They reported that the model could classify adulteration levels down to 15%.

(image from the paper)

Read more…

13533634482?profile=RESIZE_400xThere is an increasing market of mildly processed chilled Not-From-Concentrate (NFC) orange juices, preserved by methods such as high pressure processing (HPP) and pulsed electric fields (PEF).

To protect consumers from food fraud, analytical methods to differentiate such juices from thermally pasteurized juices are required.

This paper (open access) sought to identify volatile chemical markers specific to the preservation process.  To screen for appropriate candidate markers, the authors applied a complementary non-targeted volatilomics and sensomics approach.  This identified 58 candidate markers, among which 20 were quantitated and nine were statistically confirmed.

Extension of the quantitations to stored and doubly-treated juices finally resulted in the identification of (S)-carvone and vanillin as promising candidate markers. In combination, the two compounds could distinguish the HPP-treated juice from thermally treated juices and could even identify an HPP-treated juice that had received an additional thermal pasteurization.

Photo by ABHISHEK HAJARE on Unsplash

Read more…