whistleblower (2)

On September 1, 2025, Spain will launch the country’s new independent whistleblower protection authority - Autoridad Independiente de Protección del Informante (AIPI).  This is part of the implemention of Law 2/2023  This law generally applies to companies of 50 employees or more although there are nuances and caveats in the scope of application.  Companies do not necessarily have to be domiciled in Spain to fall within scope - it also applies to foreign-registered companies operating in Spain.  If you are unsure if you are within scope of the law then the advice is to check.

The AIPI brings in new new obligations regarding internal reporting systems and the designation of responsible officers.

From 1 September, companies in scope will have two months to notify the AIPI of the appointment or removal of their designated internal reporting system officers. Although the law does not yet specify the format or platform for these notifications, it is expected that the AIPI will issue operational guidance shortly after its launch.

The AIPI is designed to be a central enforcement and support body with broad powers, including:

  • Managing the external reporting channel for whistleblowers.
  • Providing protection and support to individuals who report misconduct.
  • Initiating and resolving sanctioning procedures for violations of Law 2/2023.
  • Issuing circulars and recommendations to guide best practices in whistleblower protection and compliance.
  • Developing public sector crime prevention models, which may influence private sector compliance standards

Source - Baker McKenzie blog on Lexology site

Read more…

12434804476?profile=RESIZE_400xA recent report (open access) by the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) concluded that it is beneficial to financially reward whistleblowers, and recommends a UK consultation to bring in the necessary legislation.  The conclusions were strongly supported by Nick Ephgrave, Director of the Serious Fraud Office, at the report’s launch event on 10 December.

Many jurisdictions already have such schemes.  For example, in the US, the Department of Justice is running a 3 year pilot to reward whistleblowers with a percentage of forfeited proceeds.  The scheme is targeted at, but not exclusive to, frauds involving bribery and currency offences.  It  is only triggered if the whistleblower’s information leads to a forfeiture above $1 million USD. 

The legal and corporate cultural landscape is very different in the UK compared to the US, and the RUSI report makes the point that any national whistleblower reward scheme needs to be tailored rather than a “cut-and-paste” from another jurisdiction.  Rewards are just one facet of a successful whistleblower scheme and the report makes many more detailed recommendations.

Read more…