"Which foods are most adulterated?" is a question that the Food Authenticity Network is frequently asked, so we are delighted to be continuing to collaborate with FoodChain ID to provide this information.
Foods most reported as being fraudulent based on data from the FoodChain ID Food Fraud Database, are posted on an annual basis in the Food Fraud Prevention section of the Food Authenticity Network website.
The 2022 data has just been added to the 'Most adulterated foods' section.
The Consumer Insights tracker provides up-to-date findings each month on consumer behaviour and attitudes in relation to the following topics:
This monthly bulletin summaries the key findings for each of these topics from wave 18 of the survey (conducted 13 – 15 January 2023).
The proportion of participants who reported that they were ‘confident’ in the food supply chain was 65% in January 2023. This is in line with the previous month (65%, December 2022), but is significantly lower than the year prior (70%, January 2022).
Monthly data tables are available to download via the FSA’s data catalogue. Tracker bulletins dating back to April 2022 are available to view via the Consumer insights tracker webpage. More detailed commentary, and timeseries analysis is published periodically on the Consumer Insights tracker webpage.
The Food Authenticity Network has worked with Defra, FSA, FSS, NFCU, SFCIU and the Food Authenticity Centres of Expertise to agree a framework for a co-ordinated response from food authenticity Centres of Expertise to national / international food and feed fraud incidents / investigations.
Official controls of food and feed labelling and compositional standards involves the verification of labelled product information and requires a wide range of analytical and molecular biological techniques to be deployed, many with exacting instrumentation requirements and in-depth scientific interpretation of the datasets generated. In recognition that no single institution could field the complete range of such techniques with the required expertise in all of the food and feed commodity groups, a number of Food Authenticity Centres of Expertise (CoEs) have been acknowledged (see below for list and further information).
It was envisaged that the virtual network of CoEs would function in a similar way to a National Reference Laboratory by helping to ensure that authenticity testing methods employed are fit for purpose and offer expert advice to the food authenticity analytical community as required.
A framework has been produced for collaboration of Food Authenticity Centres of Expertise to facilitate the formulation a collective technical view, in response to a request from UK Government, during an emergency food or feed fraud incident/investigation. A collective technical view will facilitate UK Government in making evidence-based decisions in a timely manner so as to minimise the impact on legitimate businesses and protect consumers.
The Framework is not a public document but the process flow diagram is presented above to illustrate the process agreed. An accessible version is available here.
The Framework flow chart and the accessible version have also been added to the CoE page on this network.
The Food Authenticity Network is pleased to announce that the four FOOD AUTHENTICITY trademarks shown are now UK registered trademarks of LGC.
The trademarks cover Services undertaken in:
The Food Authenticity Network is delighted to have been interviewed by Nick Hughes and be featured in this article in The Grocer that marks the tenth anniversary of the 2013 horsemeat issue, which rocked the food industry world-wide.
A decade on, there is widespread recognition that much of this trust has been rebuilt. Yet as we move into 2023, experts warn that a new perfect storm of factors is creating an ideal set of conditions for fraudsters to exploit.
On the tenth anniversary of one of the industry’s darkest episodes, it’s timely to ask the question: is our food chain any safer from the risk of fraud?
“We have many more lines of defence [now],” says Emily Miles, CEO of the Food Standards Agency. “But that doesn’t mean there couldn’t be another scandal [like horsemeat].”
Read the full article.
Definitions for Food fraud and related terms from this report, funded by Defra, FSA and FSS, published last year, have been added to a new 'Definitions' page in the Food Fraud Prevention section of this website.
A 'Standardisation' page has also been created, which summarises global standardisation initiatives on food authenticity.
The Innovate UK programme Analysis for Innovators (A4I) is a very different type of programme from Innovate UK. It is focused on helping individual companies to solve tricky and, perhaps, long running technical challenges, affecting existing processes, products, or services. A4I works with companies from sectors ranging from healthcare to the food and cosmetics sectors.
The National Measurement Laboratory (NML) is a founding partner of the A4I Programme and is the UK’s designated institute for chemical and bio-measurement, supporting the work of the Government Chemist.
Through A4I, we provide companies with access to our state-of-the-art measurement and analytical capabilities, helping them address problems and challenges in innovative ways, boosting their competitiveness and productivity. Other partners include, National Physical Laboratory (NPL), the National Engineering Laboratory (NEL), the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), Advanced Sustainable Manufacturing Technologies, Henry Royce Institute, National Gear Metrology Lab, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Newton Gateway to Mathematics
If you are new to the Programme we encourage you to watch the online A4I briefing here.
Opens: 07/11/2022 Closes: 04/01/2023
Do you have a question for the NML? email us here
For more information about the Programme and how to apply, please visit the A4I website
FoodBioSystems Doctoral Training Partnership (DTP) brings together six university partners: University of Reading, Cranfield University, University of Surrey, Queen’s University Belfast, Aberystwyth University, and Brunel University London.
Project title: Developing next-generation portable rapid tests for food authenticity
Project No: FBS2023-08-Campbell-qr
Lead supervisor: Katrina Campbell, Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast
Email: katrina.campbell@qub.ac.uk
Co-supervisors:
Alexander Edwards, University of Reading, Adrian Rogers, Bio-Check (UK)
Deadline for applications: Monday 30 January at 10.00 am (GMT)
The aim of this PhD is to develop a simple effective diagnostic test for the simultaneous multiplex analysis of different animal species for example cow, sheep, porcine, turkey, chicken, equine, donkey and goat that can be used for field-based analysis.
The student will explore the feasibility of adapting current lateral flow immunoassays using several recent developments including, for example:
These innovations will be explored alongside biorecognition element design and assay development for the industrially- and public safety-driven targets.
The PhD conducted mainly at Queen's University Belfast will offer placements at Reading University for biotechnology design and is supported by an industrial partner BIO-CHECK UK who will bring further insight into practical constraints of cost-effective mass-manufacture, marketing and basic business skills for the student.
By applying analytical science to this specific problem, the student will be able to systematically optimise assay performance, at the same time as recognising the pathway to real product development through industrial oversight.
Further information can be found here.
For more information about DTP, the selection process and what its like to be a DTP student, join their Applicant Webinar on 11 January 2023 (17:00 GMT). Please complete the registration form if you would like to attend.
The Food Authenticity Network has worked with all fifteen of our Food Authenticity Centres of Expertise (CoEs) to update their Informational posters, which can be accessed by the Centres of Expertise page of this website.
There is a name person, telephone number and email address for each of he fifteen CoEs.
The National Measurement System (NMS) is an essential part of the UK’s research and innovation infrastructure that is critical for science, innovation and trade.
This strategy describes how the UK will capitalise on its world-leading National Measurement System from during the 2020s and beyond.
The National Measurement System will focus on three challenges where enhanced measurement capability and expertise will support the UK:
The UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) funds the NMS. The NMS, via the Government Chemist, contributes funding for the Food Authenticity Network.
Our Advisory Board Member Dr John Spink has developed the new Food Fraud Prevention section of the Handbook for Safe Processing of Nuts (4th Edition), published by the Peanut and Tree Nut Processors Association (PTNPA).
The peanut and tree nut products are both finished goods and raw material food ingredients that impact nearly the entire food supply chain.
This section has been created as a stand-alone, comprehensive overview and guide for the PTNPA members to address food fraud prevention.
The food fraud prevention section emphasizes the food fraud vulnerability assessment (FFVA) concepts and application: “One of the most important steps is calibrating the FFVA with all other food safety and enterprise-wide risks. The food fraud problems should not be ranked only versus the other food fraud problems. The same likelihood and consequence ranks, and the same enterprise-wide risk tolerance should be used. It is possible that most of the food fraud problems fall below the enterprise-wide risk tolerance.”
To reduce confusion, it is important to understand that food fraud prevention should be a part of food integrity (Figure).
Figure: Hierarchy and Relationship of Food Fraud Related Terms with the Addition of Food Protection, Food Integrity, Food Authenticity, Social Responsibility, and Food Security
A practical application is presented in terms of the Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment two-stage approach of “Food Fraud Initial Screening (FFIS)” and then a more “detailed assessment” is conducted, as needed.
Without a Food Fraud Management System, no food fraud prevention activity would be complete. This handbook provides a step-by-step approach for completing a Vulnerability Assessment and Critical Control Point Plan (VACCP). This utilizes the Food Fraud Prevention Cycle (FFPC). The section concludes with a practical method for “Implementing a Management System” and “Integration into the Food Safety Management System.”
Reference (Free document): PTNPA, Peanut and Tree Nut Processors Association, Handbook for Safe Processing of Nuts (4th Edition), URL: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.ptnpa.org/resource/resmgr/industry_information/2022/industry_handbook_oct22.pdf
The Food Standards Agency's National Food Crime Unit (NFCU) has published a video on the types of food crime you might come across and how to report it.
The NFCU and partners tackle food crime every day to make sure food is safe to eat and is what it says it is.
NFCU colleagues work closely with the food industry to ensure that businesses are well-informed and prepared so they know how to spot food crime and stop it.
UK Hospitality has published a Catering Industry Guide to Good Hygiene Practice that mentions food fraud and food crime for the first time.
The industry guide to good hygiene practice provides information on legal obligations for caterers and the practical requirements to comply with food hygiene law. The guide also offers advice to operators on good practice, which although is not a legal requirement, is likely to contribute to the overall achievement of food safety and customer satisfaction.
The guide has been developed by the food industry and is recognised by the Food Standards Agency and Food Standards Scotland, in accordance with Article 8 of Retained Regulation (EC) No. 852/2004.
The updated version of the guide includes four new sections:
An E-copy is free to download, you can access it here
A printed copy is available at a cost of £25 + postage for UKH members, and £35 + postage for non-members. To order your printed copy, please complete your details here
Isotope ratio data are increasingly used in a variety of fields including, ecology, marine sciences, earth and geosciences, forensic science, hydrology, medicine, food (including food authenticity and origin), and climate science.
Over the years, there have also been changes to guidelines for measurement methods, calibration conventions and even to international measurement standards that form the base of the traceability chain for isotope delta values for H, C, N, O and S.
It is impossible to combine isotope ratio data from a variety of sources unless the data are accompanied by a clear description of traceability and other method details.
The UK National Measurement Laboratory at LGC was part of an international group that compiled the IUPAC Technical Report presenting minimum requirements for reporting isotope ratio data, covering analytical procedure, traceability, data processing and uncertainty evaluation.
This report will help in the standardisation of methods that involve the measurement of stable isotopes.
Read the IUPAC Technical Report on minimum requirements for publishing hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur stable-isotope delta results.
Since the pandemic, almost 40% of us order takeaway food through an app or online. Some 170,000 food businesses are on three of the biggest online platforms, Just Eat, Uber Eats and Deliveroo. They have significant reach across the takeaway, restaurant and food-to-go sectors.
These three online platforms, supported by the FSA, have developed a new Food Safety Charter. The Charter commits them to make sure businesses selling food through their platforms are registered with their Local Authority and meet a minimum standard under the Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS). The Charter also commits them to use their communication channels to businesses and customers to share FSA hygiene and safety information and support those with food hypersensitivities.
This initiative is a great starting point for FSA's work with online platforms and it believes it will improve compliance of food businesses with minimum standards. FSA is working to ensure food is safe wherever you buy it, and the Food Safety Charter is an example of the FSA following our guiding principle of working with and through others to protect consumers.
If you have any thoughts on regulating online food sales, FSA would be really interested to hear them in the comments section of this blog.
At the 1996 World Food Summit, the Heads of State and Government reaffirmed the right of everyone to have access to safe and nutritious food, consistent with the right to adequate food and the fundamental right of everyone to be free from hunger (World Food Summit,1996). To achieve this commitment, agrifood systems will need to be transformed to sustainably deliver safe and nutritious food for all.
This publication from the Food and Agriculture Organization explores a selection of the most relevant drivers and trends identified through the FAO food safety foresight programme. While for some of the drivers and trends the food safety implications are apparent, for others these may not be as obvious. An overview of the various drivers and trends are discussed for the following selection of emerging areas of interest, as identified through the FAO food safety foresight programme:
Read full report.
This new article by our Advisory Board Member, Dr John Spink, provides a summary of the past year and drills into lessons learned and best practice recommendations.
The article can be summarized as: “The crux of the last year of supply chain management is that our problems have shifted from ‘known knowns’ to ‘unknowables.’” What I mean by this is that previously we could expect similar types of supply chain disruptions. Now, between the lingering COVID impact, the Ukraine-Russia repercussions, plus other stressors, we’re seeing many completely new and unexpected types of problems.
Read full article.
The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has updated its areas of research interest (ARI) to include a focus on food that is healthier and more sustainable.
FSA has added four new ARI that reflect the updated priorities in their 2022-2027 strategy: that food is safe; is what it says it is; and is healthier and more sustainable. The update includes revising the overarching research themes and the addition of four new ARI. The updated ARIs are:
JRC has published its monthly summary on articles covering food fraud and adulteration. In this issue, there are articles on frauds involving:
Read the full summary at: August 2022 JRC Food Fraud Summary
High performance liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) was used to identify gelatin from seven commercial cyprinid fishes;, black carp, grass carp, silver carp, bighead carp, common carp, crucian carp, and Wuchang bream.
By comparison with theoretical mammalian collagen (bovine and porcine collagen), the common and unique theoretical peptides were found in the collagen of grass carp, silver carp, and crucian carp, respectively. Seven common characteristic peptides were obtained from the fish gelatins. Moreover, 44, 36, and 42 unique characteristic peptides were detected in the gelatins of grass carp, silver carp, and crucian carp, respectively.
The researchers concluded that the combined use of common and unique characteristic peptides could verify fish gelatin in comparison with mammalian gelatin.
Read abstract.
